The problem
A final verdict gives only part of a model review. To inspect the process, a reviewer also needs the arguments, responses, and comparisons that led to it.
Making the review available for inspection
RigorDesk stores review rounds and verdicts for replay. It supports seven debate protocols and pairwise scoring, making both the discussion and the comparison available to inspect.
It connects to more than 100 models from 20 providers. Those integrations make different model configurations available within the review workflow.
What the platform makes possible
A reviewer can return to the saved rounds behind a verdict and examine how the models responded to one another.
A replay preserves the recorded discussion. A new run can produce different responses, and model agreement alone does not establish that a conclusion is correct.
Implementation
TypeScript · Next.js · Python · PostgreSQL